Women in the Sloane Lab Knowledge Base

© Dr Rosalind White & The Sloane Lab 2024

The intention for this site is to make it easier for users to locate and engage with these narratives. 

Just as recent historiography has sought to ‘decentre Darwin’, recognising that his towering status in the history of science is, in part, a retrospective construction, so too have Sloane scholars sought to reassess Sloane’s legacy. His work was not the product of a lone genius, but rather the outcome of contributions from a broad and often overlooked array of individuals — women, children, servants, enslaved people, and indigenous communities — whose knowledge and labour were integral to the creation of his collections. 

The life cycle of the butterfly, from an album of 160 drawings entitled ‘Merian’s Drawings of European Insects &c’, by Maria Sibylla Merian, watercolour and bodycolour, on vellum, c. 1670-1682, (detail) © The Trustees of the British Museum. Photograph with magnifying glass taken by the author.

Despite societal norms and legal restrictions that limited their property rights, access to education, and professional recognition, many women still found ways to make significant contributions to Sloane’s collections. However, their presence is often challenging to uncover, obscured by the lack of full names and the limitations of contemporaneous documentation. The narratives of these women are seldom fully visible, and much of their involvement has been lost to history or underemphasised in traditional archival records. Yet, through careful sifting of historical documents, the stories of lesser-known women within Sloane’s collections begins to surface. 

The concept of ‘object biography’ — which considers specimens not merely as natural objects, but as cultural artefacts imbued with significant human histories — offers a particularly useful approach to uncovering the stories of these women. Curators like Miranda Lowe and Subhadra Das have highlighted how natural history specimens, in particular, are often approached from a decontextualised, ahistorical ‘hard science’ perspective, which overlooks the cultural and social dimensions of these collections.1 Through this resource, I hope to bring these dimensions to the fore.

Miscellaneous Contributions

Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London Volume 39, Issue 443 Oct 1736. © 2017 Royal Society.

A catalogue of the rarities to be seen at Don Saltero’s Coffee-house in Chelsea. To which is added, a complete list of the donors thereof / [Don Saltero].

Slide


Download the Dataset

This dataset is designed as an initial step in understanding and expanding the representation of women within Hans Sloane’s collections via the Sloane Lab Knowledge Base.

It offers a snapshot of the various ways women are documented and represented, detailing their roles (e.g., artist, author), the type of entries associated with them, and additional contextual information.


Download the Guide

This guide is part of a broader effort to enhance how narratives of marginalised individuals are accessed, understood, and valued within the SLKB.

A Guide to Finding Women in the Sloane Lab Knowledge Base

This research was generously funded by University College London (UCL) through The Sloane Lab, one of five ‘Discovery Projects’ under the Towards a National Collection initiative, supported by the Arts and Humanities Research Council.

  1. Das, Subhadra, and Miranda Lowe. ‘Nature Read in Black and White: Decolonial Approaches to Interpreting Natural History’. Journal of Natural Science Collection, vol. 6, p. 4‐14. ↩︎
  2. Don Saltero’s combined the social atmosphere of a coffee house with a curiosity museum, featuring items donated by Sir Hans Sloane, (Salter’s former employer). After her father’s death in 1728, May managed the coffee house for over 30 years, during which ten catalogues survived. Though contemporary sources credited her husband, recent scholarship recognises May as the true proprietor despite legal constraints of the time. See Brun, Katie. Contextualising Title Pages by Material Culture: Typography & List of Rarities A Case Study Don Saltero’s Coffeehouse Catalogues, 1729 – 1795. 2023. Durham University, Masters, http://etheses.dur.ac.uk/14925/. ↩︎
  3. Burton, William. ‘V. Part of a Letter from William Burton, M. D. at Windsor, to C. Mortimer, R. S. Secr. Concerning the Viper-Catchers, and Their Remedy for the Bite of a Viper’. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, vol. 39, no. 443, Jan. 1997, pp. 312–312. ↩︎
  4. Cecilia (Stede) Garrard (d.1753) the wife of Sir Nicholas Garrard (1665-1727). Garrard, Cecilia. To Hans Sloane. 6 July 1731. British Library, Sloane MS 4053, f. 269. ↩︎
  5. Mary Shirley, Countess Ferrers, (née Meredith), later Lady Frederick Campbell (c. 1730- 1807). Ferrers, Mary. To Hans Sloane. undated. British Library, Sloane MS 4058, fols. 327–33. ↩︎
  6. Byde, Katherine. To Hans Sloane. British Library, Sloane MS 4058, fol. 98. ↩︎
  7. Astell, Mary. To Hans Sloane. 2 July 1720. British Library, Sloane MS 4045, ff. 336-337.
    —. To Hans Sloane. 25 Apr. 1724. British Library, Sloane MS 4047, f. 163. Mary Astell (1666-1731). ↩︎